On 4 September 2014 06:34, Carrot Wei wrote:
> Changed the coding style.
>
>
> 2014-09-03 Guozhi Wei
>
> PR target/62040
> * gcc.target/aarch64/pr62040.c: New test.
Thank you. OK /Marcus
Changed the coding style.
2014-09-03 Guozhi Wei
PR target/62040
* gcc.target/aarch64/pr62040.c: New test.
Index: pr62040.c
===
--- pr62040.c (revision 0)
+++ pr62040.c (revision 0)
@@ -0,0 +1,21 @@
+/* { dg-do c
On 20 August 2014 00:43, Carrot Wei wrote:
> Hi
>
> Current AArch64 backend can generate rtl expressions like
> (vec_duplicate:DI (const_int 0 [0])), which causes ICE in
> simplify_const_unary_operation because vec_duplicate should generate
> vector mode only.
>
> As suggested by Andrew in the bug
On 20 August 2014 20:51, Carrot Wei wrote:
> Good suggestion. Add the testcase.
>
> thanks
> Guozhi Wei
>
> 2014-08-20 Guozhi Wei
>
> PR target/62040
> * gcc.target/aarch64/pr62040.c: New test.
>
> Index: pr62040.c
> ==
AArch64 maintainers, could you help to review following patches?
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-08/msg01966.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-08/msg02060.html
thanks
Guozhi Wei
On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 12:51 PM, Carrot Wei wrote:
> Good suggestion. Add the testcase.
>
> than
Good suggestion. Add the testcase.
thanks
Guozhi Wei
2014-08-20 Guozhi Wei
PR target/62040
* gcc.target/aarch64/pr62040.c: New test.
Index: pr62040.c
===
--- pr62040.c (revision 0)
+++ pr62040.c (revision 0)
@@ -
Hi Carrot,
cc'ing the aarch64 maintainers...
On 20/08/14 00:43, Carrot Wei wrote:
Hi
Current AArch64 backend can generate rtl expressions like
(vec_duplicate:DI (const_int 0 [0])), which causes ICE in
simplify_const_unary_operation because vec_duplicate should generate
vector mode only.
As su
Hi
Current AArch64 backend can generate rtl expressions like
(vec_duplicate:DI (const_int 0 [0])), which causes ICE in
simplify_const_unary_operation because vec_duplicate should generate
vector mode only.
As suggested by Andrew in the bug entry, I split the original insn
patterns to avoid scalar
