On 04/04/13 14:16, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Thu, Apr 04, 2013 at 02:11:39PM +0100, Ramana Radhakrishnan wrote:
This backports the fix for PR48308 something that's slipped through
the cracks. I wrote the backport and then noticed that Mikael had a
similar solution - the only difference being arou
On Thu, Apr 04, 2013 at 02:11:39PM +0100, Ramana Radhakrishnan wrote:
>
> This backports the fix for PR48308 something that's slipped through
> the cracks. I wrote the backport and then noticed that Mikael had a
> similar solution - the only difference being around this guarded for
> HAVE_cc0 targ
Hi,
This backports the fix for PR48308 something that's slipped through the
cracks. I wrote the backport and then noticed that Mikael had a similar
solution - the only difference being around this guarded for HAVE_cc0
targets.
Tested cross arm-none-linux-gnueabi - no regressions.
Bootstrapp
