Hi!
Given this:
On 2016-11-10T18:44:52+0800, Chung-Lin Tang wrote:
> --- tree.c(revision 241809)
> +++ tree.c(working copy)
> @@ -327,7 +327,7 @@ unsigned const char omp_clause_num_ops[] =
> - 1, /* OMP_CLAUSE_TILE */
> + 3, /* OMP_CLAUSE_TILE */
... for this:
> --- tree.h(rev
On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 05:27:14PM +0800, Chung-Lin Tang wrote:
> I've updated the patch as you suggested.
> Here's the v2 of the first patch, mainly gimplify.c adjusted.
>
> About the ChangeLog issues, I'll make sure the final committed diffs will
> solve them.
Ok.
Jakub
On 2016/11/11 5:38 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> Hi!
>
> On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 06:44:52PM +0800, Chung-Lin Tang wrote:
>
> Above this it is fine.
>
>> @@ -9388,10 +9373,23 @@ gimplify_omp_for (tree *expr_p, gimple_seq *pre_p)
>> (OMP_FOR_INIT (for_stm
Hi!
On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 06:44:52PM +0800, Chung-Lin Tang wrote:
Above this it is fine.
> @@ -9388,10 +9373,23 @@ gimplify_omp_for (tree *expr_p, gimple_seq *pre_p)
>(OMP_FOR_INIT (for_stmt))
> * 2);
This patch contains a few supporting changes that adjusts how
OMP_CLAUSE_TILE is handled. This is in support of the more
elaborate omp-low.c changes in another patch.
Thanks,
Chung-Lin
2016-XX-XX Nathan Sidwell
* tree.h (OMP_CLAUSE_TILE_ITERVAR, OMP_CLAUSE_TILE_COUNT): New.
*
