On Tue, Sep 07, 2021 at 06:07:35PM +0200, Tobias Burnus wrote:
> > depend case from the other clauses. The depend parsing tries to parse it
> > as the rigid varname followed by optional . field or array section and if
> > that fails, parses it as an expression, verifies it is lvalue and just
> > u
On 07.09.21 13:34, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Tue, Sep 07, 2021 at 01:22:43PM +0200, Tobias Burnus wrote:
On 07.09.21 12:49, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
s/taits/traits/ and I'd add /handled/& correctly/
fixed.
+@item C/C++'s lvalue expressions in @code{to}, @code{from}, @code{depend}
+ and @code{m
On Tue, Sep 07, 2021 at 01:22:43PM +0200, Tobias Burnus wrote:
> On 07.09.21 12:49, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 07, 2021 at 12:39:01PM +0200, Tobias Burnus wrote:
> > > +@item @code{declare variant} directive @tab P @tab Only C and C++
> > Even for C/C++, we don't handle the simd stuff the
On 07.09.21 12:49, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Tue, Sep 07, 2021 at 12:39:01PM +0200, Tobias Burnus wrote:
+@item @code{declare variant} directive @tab P @tab Only C and C++
Even for C/C++, we don't handle the simd stuff there (where we should be
expecting a different function types in those cases,
On Tue, Sep 07, 2021 at 12:39:01PM +0200, Tobias Burnus wrote:
> +@item @code{declare variant} directive @tab P @tab Only C and C++
Even for C/C++, we don't handle the simd stuff there (where we should be
expecting a different function types in those cases, ones following the
declare simd ABIs).
Hi Jakub,
On 07.09.21 10:14, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
libgomp.texi: Add OpenMP Implementation Status
libgomp/
* libgomp.texi (Enabling OpenMP): Refer to OMP spec in general
not to 4.5; link to new section.
(OpenMP Implementation Status): New.
Ok. I'll try to provide the 5.0 impleme
On Mon, Sep 06, 2021 at 06:48:25PM +0200, Tobias Burnus wrote:
> Hi Jakub, hi all,
>
> as the issue came up from time to time, I thought it
> makes sense to add an implementation status.
>
> I settled on putting it into libgomp.texi instead of
> a webpage or another location.
>
> The 5.1 section
Hi Jakub, hi all,
as the issue came up from time to time, I thought it
makes sense to add an implementation status.
I settled on putting it into libgomp.texi instead of
a webpage or another location.
The 5.1 section should be fine – except for additional
items. OpenMP 5.0 has stub wordings and
