Re: [Patch] libgomp/libgomp.texi: Mention -fno-builtin-omp_is_initial_device

On 8/8/24 06:20, Jakub Jelinek wrote: On Thu, Aug 08, 2024 at 02:18:48PM +0200, Tobias Burnus wrote: Document  -fno-builtin-omp_is_initial_device as discussed: Jakub Jelinek wrote: RFC: Should be document this new built-in some where? If so, where? As part of the routine description in libgomp

Re: [Patch] libgomp/libgomp.texi: Mention -fno-builtin-omp_is_initial_device (was: Re: [PATCH, v3] OpenMP: Constructors and destructors for "declare target" static aggregates)

On Thu, Aug 08, 2024 at 02:18:48PM +0200, Tobias Burnus wrote: > Document  -fno-builtin-omp_is_initial_device as discussed: > > Jakub Jelinek wrote: > > > RFC: Should be document this new built-in some where? If so, where? As > > > part > > > of the routine description in libgomp.texi? Or in exte

[Patch] libgomp/libgomp.texi: Mention -fno-builtin-omp_is_initial_device (was: Re: [PATCH, v3] OpenMP: Constructors and destructors for "declare target" static aggregates)

Document  -fno-builtin-omp_is_initial_device as discussed: Jakub Jelinek wrote: RFC: Should be document this new built-in some where? If so, where? As part of the routine description in libgomp.texi? Or in extend.texi (or even invoke.texi)? I think libgomp.texi in the omp_is_initial_device desc