Re: Ping * [Patch] Take 2: Move Objective-C runtime flags to modern options system.

2011-11-28 Thread Joseph S. Myers
On Mon, 28 Nov 2011, Iain Sandoe wrote: > Hi Joseph, > > Mike has OK'd this ... > > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-11/msg01672.html > > .. from the ObjC and Darwin points of view (and it implements your suggested > changes from the review of version 1). > > Is it now OK for trunk? OK.

Ping * [Patch] Take 2: Move Objective-C runtime flags to modern options system.

2011-11-28 Thread Iain Sandoe
Hi Joseph, Mike has OK'd this ... http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-11/msg01672.html .. from the ObjC and Darwin points of view (and it implements your suggested changes from the review of version 1). Is it now OK for trunk? thanks Iain On 14 Nov 2011, at 20:30, Iain Sandoe wrote: V

Re: [Patch] Take 2: Move Objective-C runtime flags to modern options system.

2011-11-14 Thread Mike Stump
On Nov 14, 2011, at 12:30 PM, Iain Sandoe wrote: > V2 is simpler, than :-) > OK for trunk? Ok.

Re: [Patch] Take 2: Move Objective-C runtime flags to modern options system.

2011-11-14 Thread Iain Sandoe
V2 is simpler, than http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-11/msg01335.html because (using the approach suggested by Joseph) we can initialize flag_next_runtime early enough to avoid having to deal with any other flags. [I'll still get rid of the flag_objc_sjlj_exceptions flag in a follow