On Mon, 28 Nov 2011, Iain Sandoe wrote:
> Hi Joseph,
>
> Mike has OK'd this ...
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-11/msg01672.html
>
> .. from the ObjC and Darwin points of view (and it implements your suggested
> changes from the review of version 1).
>
> Is it now OK for trunk?
OK.
Hi Joseph,
Mike has OK'd this ...
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-11/msg01672.html
.. from the ObjC and Darwin points of view (and it implements your
suggested changes from the review of version 1).
Is it now OK for trunk?
thanks
Iain
On 14 Nov 2011, at 20:30, Iain Sandoe wrote:
V
On Nov 14, 2011, at 12:30 PM, Iain Sandoe wrote:
> V2 is simpler, than
:-)
> OK for trunk?
Ok.
V2 is simpler, than
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-11/msg01335.html
because (using the approach suggested by Joseph) we can initialize
flag_next_runtime early enough to avoid having to deal with any other
flags.
[I'll still get rid of the flag_objc_sjlj_exceptions flag in a follow