On 11/15/14 20:59, David Wohlferd wrote:
On 9/15/2014 2:51 PM, Jeff Law wrote:
Let's go with your original inputs + outputs + labels change and punt
the clobbers stuff for now.
jeff
I have also added the test code you requested.
I have a release on file with the FSF, but don't have SVN write
Ping?
dw
On 11/15/2014 7:59 PM, David Wohlferd wrote:
On 9/15/2014 2:51 PM, Jeff Law wrote:
Let's go with your original inputs + outputs + labels change and punt
the clobbers stuff for now.
jeff
I have also added the test code you requested.
I have a release on file with the FSF, but don'
On 9/15/2014 2:51 PM, Jeff Law wrote:
Let's go with your original inputs + outputs + labels change and punt
the clobbers stuff for now.
jeff
I have also added the test code you requested.
I have a release on file with the FSF, but don't have SVN write access.
Problem:
extract_insn() in reco
On 09/14/14 02:13, David Wohlferd wrote:
I sent you the file you requested (off list), but never heard back from
you about the valgrind results.
Just haven't got back to it yet... There's always more to get done on
any given day than I have the time for, so I have to prioritize and some
things
I sent you the file you requested (off list), but never heard back from
you about the valgrind results.
In an effort to move this along, I installed ubuntu under virtualbox and
did a build of gcc. When running the output of this build with
valgrind, I saw a number of memory *leaks* reported,
On 08/01/14 02:07, David Wohlferd wrote:
I'd love to. Unfortunately, my platform doesn't support valgrind.
Ah.
Also, please include the testcase you had nlabels part.
I have created the testcase for the 31 labels problem. However, not so
much for the nclobbers part. And if I'm going to
On 7/30/2014 9:58 PM, Jeff Law wrote:
On 07/28/14 16:39, David Wohlferd wrote:
On 7/28/2014 12:42 PM, Jeff Law wrote:
On 07/27/14 01:26, David Wohlferd wrote:
I'm not sure which maintainer to cc for inline asm stuff?
I have a release on file with the FSF, but don't have SVN write
access.
On 07/28/14 16:39, David Wohlferd wrote:
On 7/28/2014 12:42 PM, Jeff Law wrote:
On 07/27/14 01:26, David Wohlferd wrote:
I'm not sure which maintainer to cc for inline asm stuff?
I have a release on file with the FSF, but don't have SVN write access.
Problem:
extract_insn() in recog.c will I
On 7/28/2014 12:42 PM, Jeff Law wrote:
On 07/27/14 01:26, David Wohlferd wrote:
I'm not sure which maintainer to cc for inline asm stuff?
I have a release on file with the FSF, but don't have SVN write access.
Problem:
extract_insn() in recog.c will ICE if (noperands > MAX_RECOG_OPERANDS).
No
On 07/27/14 01:26, David Wohlferd wrote:
I'm not sure which maintainer to cc for inline asm stuff?
I have a release on file with the FSF, but don't have SVN write access.
Problem:
extract_insn() in recog.c will ICE if (noperands > MAX_RECOG_OPERANDS).
Normally this isn't a problem since expand_
I'm not sure which maintainer to cc for inline asm stuff?
I have a release on file with the FSF, but don't have SVN write access.
Problem:
extract_insn() in recog.c will ICE if (noperands > MAX_RECOG_OPERANDS).
Normally this isn't a problem since expand_asm_operands() in cfgexpand.c
catches a
11 matches
Mail list logo
