On Mon, 5 May 2014, Dominique Dhumieres wrote:
> With the following patch, gfortran can be regtested with -flto
> with no failure, but pr54852 and pr60061.
>
> OK for trunk?
>
> Dominique
>
> 2014-05-05 Dominique d'Humieres
>
> * gfortran.dg/gfortran.dg/bind_c_array_params_2.f90:
>
On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 11:38 AM, Dominique Dhumieres
wrote:
>> Probably, alpha is not the only one that fails this assumption.
>
> Indeed! see the thread starting at
> https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2014-05/msg00127.html
>
> Could you test the following patch
>
> --- ../_clean/gcc/testsuite/gfort
> Probably, alpha is not the only one that fails this assumption.
Indeed! see the thread starting at
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2014-05/msg00127.html
Could you test the following patch
--- ../_clean/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/bind_c_array_params_2.f90
2014-05-24 16:17:53.0 +020
Hello!
> With the following patch, gfortran can be regtested with -flto
> with no failure, but pr54852 and pr60061.
-! { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "myBindC" 1 { target { ! {
hppa*-*-hpux* } } } } }
-! { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "myBindC,%r2" 1 { target {
hppa*-*-hpux* } } } }
+! { dg
domi...@lps.ens.fr (Dominique Dhumieres) writes:
> Does the following patch fixes the problem?
Worksforme.
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, sch...@linux-m68k.org
GPG Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
"And now for something completely different."
> bl myBindC
> jsr myBindC
> bl myBindC
Is this for the same target, or for 3 different ones? which one(s)?
Does the following patch fixes the problem?
--- ../_clean/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/bind_c_array_params_2.f90
2014-05-24 16:17:53.0 +0200
+++ gcc
domi...@lps.ens.fr (Dominique Dhumieres) writes:
> grep "myBindC" bind_c_array_params_2.s
bl myBindC
jsr myBindC
bl myBindC
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, sch...@linux-m68k.org
GPG Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
"And now for someth
> > grep "_myBindC" bind_c_array_params_2.s
>
> Empty.
And
grep "myBindC" bind_c_array_params_2.s
?
Dominique
domi...@lps.ens.fr (Dominique Dhumieres) writes:
> Could you post the results (w/wo -flto) of
>
> grep "_myBindC" bind_c_array_params_2.s
Empty.
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, sch...@linux-m68k.org
GPG Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
"And now for something com
> > Could you try
> >
> > --- ../_clean/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/bind_c_array_params_2.f90
> > 2014-05-24 16:17:53.0 +0200
> > +++ gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/bind_c_array_params_2.f90 2014-05-25
> > 18:52:16.0 +0200
> > @@ -16,7 +16,7 @@ integer :: aa(4,4)
> > call test(aa)
domi...@lps.ens.fr (Dominique Dhumieres) writes:
> Could you try
>
> --- ../_clean/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/bind_c_array_params_2.f90
> 2014-05-24 16:17:53.0 +0200
> +++ gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/bind_c_array_params_2.f90 2014-05-25
> 18:52:16.0 +0200
> @@ -16,7 +16,7
Could you try
--- ../_clean/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/bind_c_array_params_2.f90
2014-05-24 16:17:53.0 +0200
+++ gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/bind_c_array_params_2.f90 2014-05-25
18:52:16.0 +0200
@@ -16,7 +16,7 @@ integer :: aa(4,4)
call test(aa)
end
-! { dg-final { scan-as
domi...@lps.ens.fr (Dominique Dhumieres) writes:
>> FAIL: gfortran.dg/bind_c_array_params_2.f90 -O scan-assembler-times
>> call[^\n\r]*myBindC 1
>
> Sorry for that! Which target?
Pick any random from gcc-testresults.
> and what is the pattern?
Which pattern?
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, s
> FAIL: gfortran.dg/bind_c_array_params_2.f90 -O scan-assembler-times
> call[^\n\r]*myBindC 1
Sorry for that! Which target? and what is the pattern?
Dominique
domi...@lps.ens.fr (Dominique Dhumieres) writes:
> --- ../_clean/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/bind_c_array_params_2.f90
> 2013-01-25 09:57:48.0 +0100
> +++ gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/bind_c_array_params_2.f90 2014-02-04
> 19:24:06.0 +0100
> @@ -16,7 +16,7 @@ integer :: aa(4
On 05/24/2014 05:14 AM, Dominique Dhumieres wrote:
> Ping!
>
> https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-05/msg00219.html
>
> Dominique
>
>
Yes, OK, thanks for fixes.
Jerry
Ping!
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-05/msg00219.html
Dominique
With the following patch, gfortran can be regtested with -flto
with no failure, but pr54852 and pr60061.
OK for trunk?
Dominique
2014-05-05 Dominique d'Humieres
* gfortran.dg/gfortran.dg/bind_c_array_params_2.f90:
Adjust regexp for -flto.
* gfortran.dg/gfortran.dg/pr4
18 matches
Mail list logo
