On Fri, Feb 22, 2019 at 09:39:59AM -0600, Matthew Malcomson wrote:
> Hi James,
>
> On 22/02/19 00:09, James Greenhalgh wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 18, 2019 at 08:40:12AM -0600, Matthew Malcomson wrote:
> >>
> >> Additionally, this patch contains two tidy-ups (happy to remove them or
> >> put in
> >> a
Hi James,
On 22/02/19 00:09, James Greenhalgh wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 18, 2019 at 08:40:12AM -0600, Matthew Malcomson wrote:
>>
>> Additionally, this patch contains two tidy-ups (happy to remove them or put
>> in
>> a separate patch if people want):
>
> Generally, yes I prefer that.
>
I've remove
On Feb 21, 2019, at 4:09 PM, James Greenhalgh wrote:
>
>> NOTE: I have included a bunch of RTL testcases that I used in development,
>> these
>> don't exercise much of the compiler and are pretty specific to the backend
>> as it
>> currently is, so I'm not sure they give much value. I'd appreci
On Mon, Feb 18, 2019 at 08:40:12AM -0600, Matthew Malcomson wrote:
> Handle stack pointer with SUBS/ADDS instructions.
>
> In general the stack pointer was not handled for many SUBS/ADDS patterns in
> aarch64.md.
> Both the "extended register" and "immediate" forms allow the stack pointer to
> be
Handle stack pointer with SUBS/ADDS instructions.
In general the stack pointer was not handled for many SUBS/ADDS patterns in
aarch64.md.
Both the "extended register" and "immediate" forms allow the stack pointer to be
used as the source register, while no form allows the stack pointer for the
des
