Re: [Patch,AVR] PR54222: Add fixed point support

2012-08-24 Thread Denis Chertykov
2012/8/23 Georg-Johann Lay : > Denis Chertykov wrote: >> 2012/8/13 Georg-Johann Lay: >>> Denis Chertykov wrote: 2012/8/11 Georg-Johann Lay: > Weddington, Eric schrieb: >>> From: Georg-Johann Lay >>> >>> >>> The first step would be to bisect and find the patch that lead to >

Re: [Patch,AVR] PR54222: Add fixed point support

2012-08-23 Thread Georg-Johann Lay
Weddington, Eric wrote: > >> Georg-Johann Lay: >> >> Hi, here is an updated patch. >> >> Some functions are reworked and there is some code clean up. >> >> The test results look good, there are no additional regressions. >> >> The new test cases in gcc.dg/fixed-point pass except some convert-*

RE: [Patch,AVR] PR54222: Add fixed point support

2012-08-23 Thread Weddington, Eric
> -Original Message- > From: Georg-Johann Lay > Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2012 8:49 AM > To: Denis Chertykov > Cc: Weddington, Eric; gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org > Subject: Re: [Patch,AVR] PR54222: Add fixed point support > > Hi, here is an updated patch. > &g

Re: [Patch,AVR] PR54222: Add fixed point support

2012-08-21 Thread Denis Chertykov
2012/8/13 Georg-Johann Lay : > Denis Chertykov wrote: >> 2012/8/11 Georg-Johann Lay : >>> Weddington, Eric schrieb: > From: Georg-Johann Lay > > > The first step would be to bisect and find the patch that lead to > PR53923. It was not a change in the avr BE, so the question goe

Re: [Patch,AVR] PR54222: Add fixed point support

2012-08-13 Thread Georg-Johann Lay
Denis Chertykov wrote: > 2012/8/11 Georg-Johann Lay : >> Weddington, Eric schrieb: From: Georg-Johann Lay The first step would be to bisect and find the patch that lead to PR53923. It was not a change in the avr BE, so the question goes to the authors of the respectiv

Re: [Patch,AVR] PR54222: Add fixed point support

2012-08-12 Thread Denis Chertykov
2012/8/11 Georg-Johann Lay : > Weddington, Eric schrieb: >>> >>> From: Georg-Johann Lay >>> >>> >>> The first step would be to bisect and find the patch that lead to >>> PR53923. It was not a change in the avr BE, so the question goes >>> to the authors of the respective patch. >>> >>> Up to now I

Re: [Patch,AVR] PR54222: Add fixed point support

2012-08-10 Thread Georg-Johann Lay
Weddington, Eric schrieb: From: Georg-Johann Lay The first step would be to bisect and find the patch that lead to PR53923. It was not a change in the avr BE, so the question goes to the authors of the respective patch. Up to now I didn't even try to bisect; that would take years on the host

RE: [Patch,AVR] PR54222: Add fixed point support

2012-08-10 Thread Weddington, Eric
> -Original Message- > From: Georg-Johann Lay > Sent: Friday, August 10, 2012 11:06 AM > To: Weddington, Eric > Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org; Denis Chertykov > Subject: Re: [Patch,AVR] PR54222: Add fixed point support > > The first step would be to bisect and fin

Re: [Patch,AVR] PR54222: Add fixed point support

2012-08-10 Thread Georg-Johann Lay
Weddington, Eric wrote: >> From: Georg-Johann Lay >> The patch works out fine. However, because of PR53923 which >> shreds the AVR port, currently no reasonable testing is possible. >> >> Work to be done is better testing after PR53923 is fixed and the >> AVR port works properly again. > > Is the

RE: [Patch,AVR] PR54222: Add fixed point support

2012-08-10 Thread Weddington, Eric
> -Original Message- > From: Georg-Johann Lay > Sent: Friday, August 10, 2012 9:52 AM > To: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org > Cc: Denis Chertykov; Weddington, Eric; Sean D'Epagnier; Joerg Wunsch > Subject: [Patch,AVR] PR54222: Add fixed point support > > This patc