Re: [Patch, testsuite] Require int32plus and scheduling support for some tests

2016-04-26 Thread Jeff Law
On 04/04/2016 06:00 AM, Senthil Kumar Selvaraj wrote: 2016-04-04 Senthil Kumar Selvaraj * gcc.c-torture/compile/pr69102.c: Require scheduling support. * gcc.c-torture/compile/pr37669.c: Require >=32 bit integers. * gcc.c-torture/execute/bitfld-6.c: Likewise. * gcc.c-torture/ex

Re: [Patch, testsuite] Require int32plus and scheduling support for some tests

2016-04-15 Thread Mike Stump
> On Apr 4, 2016, at 5:00 AM, Senthil Kumar Selvaraj > wrote: > This patch add dg-require-effective-target directives to a few tests > that were failing unnecessarily for the AVR target. So the branch has been cut. We’re now in RM only mode. The change looks reasonably safe for the branch.

Re: [Patch, testsuite] Require int32plus and scheduling support for some tests

2016-04-13 Thread Senthil Kumar Selvaraj
Ping! Regards Senthil Senthil Kumar Selvaraj writes: > Hi, > > This patch add dg-require-effective-target directives to a few tests > that were failing unnecessarily for the AVR target. > > One of them invokes the compiler with -fschedule-insns2 - I've > required scheduling support for t

[Patch, testsuite] Require int32plus and scheduling support for some tests

2016-04-04 Thread Senthil Kumar Selvaraj
Hi, This patch add dg-require-effective-target directives to a few tests that were failing unnecessarily for the AVR target. One of them invokes the compiler with -fschedule-insns2 - I've required scheduling support for that testcase. For all other tests, I've required int32plus - they