Re: [Patch, microblaze]: Remove SECONDARY_MEMORY_NEEDED

2014-02-23 Thread Michael Eager
Hunsigida; Nagaraju Mekala Subject: RE: [Patch, microblaze]: Remove SECONDARY_MEMORY_NEEDED Hi Michael, -Original Message- From: Michael Eager [mailto:ea...@eagerm.com] Sent: Friday, 17 January 2014 4:44 am To: David Holsgrove; gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Cc: Edgar Iglesias; John Williams;

Re: [Patch, microblaze]: Remove SECONDARY_MEMORY_NEEDED

2014-02-14 Thread Michael Eager
ubject: Re: [Patch, microblaze]: Remove SECONDARY_MEMORY_NEEDED On 11/25/13 23:51, David Holsgrove wrote: Hi Michael, I've attached patch based on latest gcc master. Please let me know if you need anything further. thanks, David On 15 July 2013 14:44, David Holsgrove wrote: Hi Michael, On 1

RE: [Patch, microblaze]: Remove SECONDARY_MEMORY_NEEDED

2014-02-13 Thread David Holsgrove
Hi Michael, List, > -Original Message- > From: David Holsgrove > Sent: Wednesday, 22 January 2014 1:43 pm > To: 'Michael Eager'; gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org > Cc: Edgar Iglesias; John Williams; Vidhumouli Hunsigida; Nagaraju Mekala > Subject: RE:

RE: [Patch, microblaze]: Remove SECONDARY_MEMORY_NEEDED

2014-01-21 Thread David Holsgrove
Hi Michael, > -Original Message- > From: Michael Eager [mailto:ea...@eagerm.com] > Sent: Friday, 17 January 2014 4:44 am > To: David Holsgrove; gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org > Cc: Edgar Iglesias; John Williams; Vidhumouli Hunsigida; Nagaraju Mekala > Subject: Re: [Patch, m

Re: [Patch, microblaze]: Remove SECONDARY_MEMORY_NEEDED

2014-01-16 Thread Michael Eager
On 11/25/13 23:51, David Holsgrove wrote: Hi Michael, I've attached patch based on latest gcc master. Please let me know if you need anything further. thanks, David On 15 July 2013 14:44, David Holsgrove wrote: Hi Michael, On 18 March 2013 22:49, David Holsgrove wrote: MicroBlaze doesn't

Re: [Patch, microblaze]: Remove SECONDARY_MEMORY_NEEDED

2013-11-25 Thread David Holsgrove
Hi Michael, I've attached patch based on latest gcc master. Please let me know if you need anything further. thanks, David On 15 July 2013 14:44, David Holsgrove wrote: > Hi Michael, > > On 18 March 2013 22:49, David Holsgrove wrote: >> MicroBlaze doesn't have restrictions that would force us

Re: [Patch, microblaze]: Remove SECONDARY_MEMORY_NEEDED

2013-07-14 Thread David Holsgrove
Hi Michael, On 18 March 2013 22:49, David Holsgrove wrote: > MicroBlaze doesn't have restrictions that would force us to > reload regs via memory. Don't define SECONDARY_MEMORY_NEEDED. > Fixes an ICE when compiling OpenSSL for linux. > > Changelog > > 2013-03-18 Edgar E. Iglesias > > * gcc/con

[Patch, microblaze]: Remove SECONDARY_MEMORY_NEEDED

2013-03-18 Thread David Holsgrove
MicroBlaze doesn't have restrictions that would force us to reload regs via memory. Don't define SECONDARY_MEMORY_NEEDED. Fixes an ICE when compiling OpenSSL for linux. Changelog 2013-03-18 Edgar E. Iglesias * gcc/config/microblaze/microblaze.h: Remove SECONDARY_MEMORY_NEEDED definition.