On Tue, 26 Nov 2019, Mark Eggleston wrote:
> Second attempt this time with attachment.
>From f884924877ba84578e75bd16cb127bab33eb5ee6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Mark Eggleston
Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2019 10:12:44 +
Subject: [PATCH] Update Fortran changes
+
+A blank format item a
On Tue, 26 Nov 2019, Mark Eggleston wrote:
> I've check the changes with W3 validator. There are no problems related
> to my changes, however, it does object to the lack of character encoding
> in the file. My knowledge of HTML is limited, so don't know how to fix
> that.
Let me take this as go
On 27/11/2019 08:29, Tobias Burnus wrote:
On 11/27/19 8:58 AM, Janne Blomqvist wrote:
On Tue, Nov 26, 2019 at 1:12 PM Tobias Burnus
wrote:
AUTOMATIC attribute
Speaking of which, to avoid confusion maybe we should rename the
-f[no-]automatic option to something like -f[no-]save, since the
Fo
Corrected and committed.
On 27/11/2019 09:00, Tobias Burnus wrote:
On 11/26/19 7:33 PM, Mark Eggleston wrote:
htdocs/gcc-10/changes.html | 41
+
+
+ Default fields widths can be used for I,
F
+ and G format specifiers when excplici
On 11/26/19 7:33 PM, Mark Eggleston wrote:
htdocs/gcc-10/changes.html | 41 +
+
+Default fields widths can be used for I, F
+and G format specifiers when excplicit widths are omitted.
+Use the option -fdec-format-defaults, th
On Wed, Nov 27, 2019 at 10:29 AM Tobias Burnus wrote:
>
> On 11/27/19 8:58 AM, Janne Blomqvist wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 26, 2019 at 1:12 PM Tobias Burnus
> > wrote:
> >> AUTOMATIC attribute
> > Speaking of which, to avoid confusion maybe we should rename the
> > -f[no-]automatic option to somethin
On 11/27/19 8:58 AM, Janne Blomqvist wrote:
On Tue, Nov 26, 2019 at 1:12 PM Tobias Burnus wrote:
AUTOMATIC attribute
Speaking of which, to avoid confusion maybe we should rename the
-f[no-]automatic option to something like -f[no-]save, since the
Fortran standard description of an "automatic d
On Tue, Nov 26, 2019 at 1:12 PM Tobias Burnus wrote:
> In particular, currently, the following item does not make clear that it
> is about legacy support: "Variables with the AUTOMATIC
> attribute can be used in EQUIVALENCE statements."
>
> I think it can remain as is with the -fdec umbrella item.
Second attempt this time with attachment.
Apologies.
regards,
Mark
On 26/11/2019 15:56, Mark Eggleston wrote:
On 26/11/2019 11:12, Tobias Burnus wrote:
Hi Mark,
On 11/26/19 11:46 AM, Mark Eggleston wrote:
I've check the changes with W3 validator. There are no problems
related to my change
On 26/11/2019 11:12, Tobias Burnus wrote:
Hi Mark,
On 11/26/19 11:46 AM, Mark Eggleston wrote:
I've check the changes with W3 validator. There are no problems
related to my changes, however, it does object to the lack of
character encoding in the file.
Note that some script modifies the fi
Hi Mark,
On 11/26/19 11:46 AM, Mark Eggleston wrote:
I've check the changes with W3 validator. There are no problems
related to my changes, however, it does object to the lack of
character encoding in the file.
Note that some script modifies the file a bit – the final file does have
a charac
I've check the changes with W3 validator. There are no problems related
to my changes, however, it does object to the lack of character encoding
in the file. My knowledge of HTML is limited, so don't know how to fix that.
This is the first time in changing the wwwdoc, I haven't included a
chan
12 matches
Mail list logo
