Hi Paul,
Dominique has kindly pointed out that the error message in the patch does
not correspond to the errors in the testcase. This came about because the
submitted patch was an earlier version of that on my tree. Please find
attached the correct version of the patch. The principle is the same
Dear All,
Dominique has kindly pointed out that the error message in the patch does
not correspond to the errors in the testcase. This came about because the
submitted patch was an earlier version of that on my tree. Please find
attached the correct version of the patch. The principle is the same
On Wed, Aug 05, 2020 at 03:59:38PM +0100, Paul Richard Thomas wrote:
> The attached patch builds on a draft posted by Steve Kargl. I have left the
> gcc_assert in place just in case my imagination was too limited to generate
> an ICE.
>
> Regtests OK on FC31/x86_64 - OK for trunk?
>
Looks OK to
The attached patch builds on a draft posted by Steve Kargl. I have left the
gcc_assert in place just in case my imagination was too limited to generate
an ICE.
Regtests OK on FC31/x86_64 - OK for trunk?
Paul
Change.Logs
Description: Binary data
diff --git a/gcc/fortran/resolve.c b/gcc/fortran/r
