Regarding 202y:
I think it is in general useful to have an implementation of features
before the standard is released, also to find issues before the standard
is released.
The downside I currently see is that the none of the features is really
ready (in the sense that there are explicit edits).
Hi All,
Thanks to Thomas and Andre for the reviews. I believe that I have addressed
all of the concerns in the attached and will commit this afternoon if there
are no objections.
Best regards
Paul
On Tue, 24 Sept 2024 at 09:45, Andre Vehreschild wrote:
> Hi Paul,
>
> in addition to Thomas' r
Hi Paul,
in addition to Thomas' remarks (which I second to), I have the following:
> diff --git a/gcc/fortran/intrinsic.cc b/gcc/fortran/intrinsic.cc
> index 0a6be215825..d95f35145b5 100644
> --- a/gcc/fortran/intrinsic.cc
> +++ b/gcc/fortran/intrinsic.cc
> @@ -293,11 +293,15 @@ do_ts29113_check
Am 23.09.24 um 11:02 schrieb Paul Richard Thomas:
Hi All,
The moment I saw the DIN4 proposal for "Generic processing of assumed
rank objects", I thought that this was a highly intuitive and
implementable proposal. I implemented a test version in June and had
some correspondence with Reinhold
Hi All,
The moment I saw the DIN4 proposal for "Generic processing of assumed rank
objects", I thought that this was a highly intuitive and implementable
proposal. I implemented a test version in June and had some correspondence
with Reinhold Bader about it shortly before he passed away.
Malcolm
