On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 02:46, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
> On Sun, 29 Jan 2012, Janne Blomqvist wrote:
>>> .../gcc-HEAD/gcc/fortran/decl.c:5820:23: error: invalid conversion from
>>> 'const char*' to 'char*' [-fpermissive]
>>> gmake[3]: *** [fortran/decl.o] Error 1
>> Have you tried r183679, which sh
On Sun, 29 Jan 2012, Janne Blomqvist wrote:
>> .../gcc-HEAD/gcc/fortran/decl.c:5820:23: error: invalid conversion from
>> 'const char*' to 'char*' [-fpermissive]
>> gmake[3]: *** [fortran/decl.o] Error 1
> Have you tried r183679, which should fix this?
Yes, I now tried that update (my daily teste
Janne Blomqvist wrote:
Have you tried r183679, which should fix this?
Aha, I missed the follow up patch - that explains why I didn't see it.
While I can speak only for myself, regtesting on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu. For
some reason this was/is flagged as a warning for me, not an error, so I
Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
On Sun, 29 Jan 2012, Janne Blomqvist wrote:
Taking into account the suggestions by Tobias and Mikael, attached is
the patch I just committed. Thanks for the reviews!
I am now seeing the following bootstrap error on all my FreeBSD testers,
and this does not appear to be ope
On Sun, Jan 29, 2012 at 23:36, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
> On Sun, 29 Jan 2012, Janne Blomqvist wrote:
>> Taking into account the suggestions by Tobias and Mikael, attached is
>> the patch I just committed. Thanks for the reviews!
>
> I am now seeing the following bootstrap error on all my FreeBSD tes
On Sun, 29 Jan 2012, Janne Blomqvist wrote:
> Taking into account the suggestions by Tobias and Mikael, attached is
> the patch I just committed. Thanks for the reviews!
I am now seeing the following bootstrap error on all my FreeBSD testers,
and this does not appear to be operating system-specif
On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 14:45, Mikael Morin wrote:
> On 18.01.2012 10:12, Tobias Burnus wrote:
>>
>>
>> Dear Janne,
>>
>>> the attached patch changes the binding labels that are needed for
>>> bind(C) symbols to be heap allocated rather than, as currently, being
>>> fixed size arrays of size 127 (
On 18.01.2012 10:12, Tobias Burnus wrote:
Dear Janne,
the attached patch changes the binding labels that are needed for
bind(C) symbols to be heap allocated rather than, as currently, being
fixed size arrays of size 127 (or 64 in module.c!?).
wonder whether it would have been smarter to us
Dear Janne,
> the attached patch changes the binding labels that are needed for
> bind(C) symbols to be heap allocated rather than, as currently, being
> fixed size arrays of size 127 (or 64 in module.c!?).
wonder whether it would have been smarter to use string matching rather
than the manual m
Hi,
the attached patch changes the binding labels that are needed for
bind(C) symbols to be heap allocated rather than, as currently, being
fixed size arrays of size 127 (or 64 in module.c!?). There are two
benefits of this:
1) For the vast majority of symbols which are not bind(C) symbols in a
t
10 matches
Mail list logo