Hi Tobias and Steve,
Same here: Not tested, but it looks OK.
Committed (after Steve's mail already). Thanks a lot for the reviews!
Thomas
Thomas Koenig wrote:
--- dependency.c(Revision 182430)
+++ dependency.c(Arbeitskopie)
@@ -245,7 +245,9 @@ gfc_dep_compare_functions (gfc_expr *e1, gfc_expr
* 0 if e1 == e2
* -1 if e1< e2
* -2 if the relationship could not be determined
- * -3 if e1 /= e2, but we
On Wed, Dec 28, 2011 at 04:21:55PM +0100, Thomas Koenig wrote:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2011-12/msg00102.html
>
> >OK for trunk?
>
I did not test the patch, but it appears correct to me.
OK.
--
Steve
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2011-12/msg00102.html
OK for trunk?
Regards
Thomas
Am 18.12.2011 11:15, schrieb Thomas Koenig:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2011-12/msg00102.html
Because real constants (and complex) constants are compared
for equality only, it should be pretty safe.
OK for trunk?
Ping ** 0.5714 ?
Thomas
Hello world,
here is the reworked patch for improving function elimination.
It turned out to be much simpler than the original one.
Because real constants (and complex) constants are compared
for equality only, it should be pretty safe.
OK for trunk?
Thomas
2011-12-17 Thomas Koenig
