Re: [Patch, GCC]Backporting r269039 to gcc8

2019-11-01 Thread Jeff Law
On 10/25/19 11:02 AM, Delia Burduv wrote: > Hello Jeff, > > Yes, it is a backport to gcc-8. No, I don't have commit access. Could > you please commit it for me? Done. Thanks for your patience. jeff

Re: [Patch, GCC]Backporting r269039 to gcc8

2019-10-25 Thread Delia Burduv
se.de Subject: Re: [Patch, GCC]Backporting r269039 to gcc8 On 10/4/19 9:11 AM, Delia Burduv wrote: > Ping. Has anyone had a look at the patch? Please let me know if it is fine. I think it's fine to backport to the gcc-8 branch. Do you have commit access? jeff

Re: [Patch, GCC]Backporting r269039 to gcc8

2019-10-04 Thread Jeff Law
On 10/4/19 9:11 AM, Delia Burduv wrote: > Ping. Has anyone had a look at the patch? Please let me know if it is fine. I think it's fine to backport to the gcc-8 branch. Do you have commit access? jeff

Re: [Patch, GCC]Backporting r269039 to gcc8

2019-10-04 Thread Delia Burduv
]Backporting r269039 to gcc8 Hi, I am trying to backport r269039 to gcc8 wich solved this bug report: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86487 . I have tested it on arm-none-linux-gnueabi,aarch64-none-linux-gnu and x86_64-pc-linux-gnu and there was no regression. The patch applied cleanly. I don&#

[Patch, GCC]Backporting r269039 to gcc8

2019-09-18 Thread Delia Burduv
Hi, I am trying to backport r269039 to gcc8 wich solved this bug report: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86487 . I have tested it on arm-none-linux-gnueabi,aarch64-none-linux-gnu and x86_64-pc-linux-gnu and there was no regression. The patch applied cleanly. I don't have commit ri