Re: *PING**2 [Patch, Fortran] Reject coarrays in MOVE_ALLOC

2012-06-18 Thread Paul Richard Thomas
Dear Tobias, Good catch on the non-polymorphic 'TO'! >> Updated version (cf. below). Build and regtested on x86-64-linux. >> OK for the trunk? Indeed - OK for trunk. >> >> I asked at J3 and John Reid kindly pointed me to the pending >> interpretation request F08/0040 at >> http://j3-fortran.or

Re: *PING**2 [Patch, Fortran] Reject coarrays in MOVE_ALLOC

2012-06-16 Thread Tobias Burnus
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2012-05/msg00171.html On 30.05.2012 13:56, Tobias Burnus wrote: On 05/30/2012 11:09 AM, Tobias Burnus wrote: This patch rejects actual arguments to MOVE_ALLOC which are coindexed or have a corank. Updated version (cf. below). Build and regtested on x86-64-linux.

Re: [Patch, Fortran] Reject coarrays in MOVE_ALLOC

2012-05-30 Thread Tobias Burnus
On 05/30/2012 11:09 AM, Tobias Burnus wrote: This patch rejects actual arguments to MOVE_ALLOC which are coindexed or have a corank. Updated version (cf. below). Build and regtested on x86-64-linux. OK for the trunk? I asked at J3 and John Reid kindly pointed me to the pending interpretation

Re: [Patch, Fortran] Reject coarrays in MOVE_ALLOC

2012-05-30 Thread Paul Richard Thomas
Dear Tobias, That's OK for trunk. Thanks Paul On 30 May 2012 11:09, Tobias Burnus wrote: > This patch rejects actual arguments to MOVE_ALLOC which are coindexed or > have a corank. > > Build and regtested on x86-64-linux. > OK for the trunk? > > Tobias -- The knack of flying is learning ho

[Patch, Fortran] Reject coarrays in MOVE_ALLOC

2012-05-30 Thread Tobias Burnus
This patch rejects actual arguments to MOVE_ALLOC which are coindexed or have a corank. Build and regtested on x86-64-linux. OK for the trunk? Tobias 2012-05-30 Tobias Burnus * check.c (gfc_check_move_alloc): Reject coindexed actual arguments and those with corank. 2012-05-30 Tobias Bur