On Wed, 27 Oct 2021 21:44:52 +0200
Harald Anlauf via Fortran wrote:
> Hi Bernhard,
>
> Am 27.10.21 um 19:40 schrieb Bernhard Reutner-Fischer via Fortran:
> > AFAICS current trunk still has this issue.
> > Any takers?
> > thanks,
>
> can you create a PR tracking this issue?
now https://gcc.gn
AFAICS current trunk still has this issue.
Any takers?
thanks,
On Sun, 2 Sep 2018 17:16:07 +0200
Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote:
>i spotted one
> (pre-existing) possible inconsistency that i did overlook back then:
>
> gfc_match_associate () reads
On Wed, 22 Aug 2018 at 21:37, Janus Weil wrote:
>
> Am Mi., 22. Aug. 2018 um 17:46 Uhr schrieb Thomas Koenig
> :
> >
> > Hi Janus,
> >
> > >> Janus,
> > >>
> > >> On 13 August 2018 21:44:47 CEST, Janus Weil wrote:
> > >>> Hi all,
> > >>>
> > >>> this simple patch improves some of the diagnostics
Hi all,
this simple patch improves some of the diagnostics for invalid
ASSOCIATE statements:
https://github.com/janusw/gcc/commit/2f484479c741abddc8ac473cb0c1b9010397e006
In particular it gives a more precise locus and improved wording,
which is achieved basically by splitting a 'gfc_match' into
