On 09/01/2012 15:45, Tobias Burnus wrote:
> On 01/09/2012 03:34 PM, Mikael Morin wrote:
>> The issue is that the code handling NULL() doesn't consume the gfc_ss
>> struct created for it. Your fix, which advances to the next one anyway
>> would work just well, but I think it is slightly cleaner to n
On 09.01.2012 15:45, Tobias Burnus wrote:
On 01/09/2012 03:34 PM, Mikael Morin wrote:
The issue is that the code handling NULL() doesn't consume the gfc_ss
struct created for it. Your fix, which advances to the next one anyway
would work just well, but I think it is slightly cleaner to not creat
On 01/09/2012 03:34 PM, Mikael Morin wrote:
The issue is that the code handling NULL() doesn't consume the gfc_ss
struct created for it. Your fix, which advances to the next one anyway
would work just well, but I think it is slightly cleaner to not create
the struct in the first place, as it is
Sorry Tobias, I was about to post a patch about this when I saw your
message.
The issue is that the code handling NULL() doesn't consume the gfc_ss
struct created for it. Your fix, which advances to the next one anyway
would work just well, but I think it is slightly cleaner to not create
the
The issue was discovered when looking at the optional + elemental +
scalarizer issue (PR 50981, 4.4-4.7 regression). However, the example of
this PR never worked. Passing null() to denote an absent argument (for
nonallocatable/nonpointer dummies) is a Fortran 2008 / GCC 4.6 feature.
Build and
