Hi Tobias,
In conclusion: I am fine with the FORALL part, but not with the
DO CONCURRENT part.
Yep, you're right. I have modified the patch accordingly. Here
is what I committed.
Best regards
Thomas
Index: fortran/ChangeLog
==
Hi Thomas,
> the attached patch fixes the PR by removing common function elimination
> in FORALL statements.
I think that part is OK. However, you do more - you also avoid the handling
for DO CONCURRENT.
However, I do not see why it could fail for DO CONCURRENT or rather: I do
not see a case whe
Hello world,
the attached patch fixes the PR by removing common function elimination
in FORALL statements.
In the course of fixing this PR, I had originally fixed the ICE only to
find that the transformation (where f is a function)
forall (i=1:2)
a(i) = f(i) + f(i)
end forall
to
forall (i=1
