Re: [Patch, Fortran, 66927, v2.1] [6 Regression] ICE in gfc_conf_procedure_call

2015-10-26 Thread Andre Vehreschild
Hi Paul, thanks for the quick review. Submitted as r229353. Many thanks and regards, Andre On Mon, 26 Oct 2015 13:04:27 +0100 Paul Richard Thomas wrote: > Hi Andre, > > Yes, that's good to fix the problem. OK to commit > > Thanks for the rapid fix. > > Paul > > On 26 October 2015 a

Re: [Patch, Fortran, 66927, v2.1] [6 Regression] ICE in gfc_conf_procedure_call

2015-10-26 Thread Paul Richard Thomas
Hi Andre, Yes, that's good to fix the problem. OK to commit Thanks for the rapid fix. Paul On 26 October 2015 at 11:03, Andre Vehreschild wrote: > Hi all, > > unfortunately did my last patch create a segfault on some 32-bit > system. This happens because in the scalarizer the lower bound of th

Re: [Patch, Fortran, 66927, v2.1] [6 Regression] ICE in gfc_conf_procedure_call

2015-10-26 Thread Andre Vehreschild
Hi all, unfortunately did my last patch create a segfault on some 32-bit system. This happens because in the scalarizer the lower bound of the deferred length array of the source= expression was taken to be constant zero instead of taking that information from the array descriptor. This patch fixe