On 12/04/2019 02:42, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
The test fell back to long long and long when __int128 is not
available, but it assumed sizeof(long) < sizeof(long long) because of
a shift count that would be out of range for a long long if their
widths are the same. Fixed by splitting it up into two
The test fell back to long long and long when __int128 is not
available, but it assumed sizeof(long) < sizeof(long long) because of
a shift count that would be out of range for a long long if their
widths are the same. Fixed by splitting it up into two shifts.
Tested on x86_64-linux-gnu, -m64 and
