Re: [PR middle-end/71373] Handle more OMP_CLAUSE_* in nested function decomposition

2016-06-02 Thread Jakub Jelinek
d.c is only used by C and Fortran. > [PR middle-end/71373] Handle more OMP_CLAUSE_* in nested function > decomposition > > gcc/ > * gimplify.c (gimplify_adjust_omp_clauses): Discard > OMP_CLAUSE_TILE. > * omp-low.c (scan_sharing_clause

Re: [PR middle-end/71373] Handle more OMP_CLAUSE_* in nested function decomposition

2016-06-02 Thread Thomas Schwinge
oot.php?message_id=%3C877fe7sthf.fsf%40kepler.schwinge.homeip.net%3E>, so that one will need to go in first, before I'll then commit the following: commit 7eff9da0e8fe5eda7d76b9a27dbb1ec4e6183844 Author: Thomas Schwinge Date: Wed Jun 1 17:01:35 2016 +0200 [PR middle-end/71373] Han

Re: [PR middle-end/71373] Handle more OMP_CLAUSE_* in nested function decomposition

2016-06-01 Thread Jakub Jelinek
On Wed, Jun 01, 2016 at 05:06:42PM +0200, Thomas Schwinge wrote: > Here are the OpenACC bits of . > > As we're currently not paying attention to OpenACC tile clauses in the > middle end, and thus OMP_CLAUSE_TILE's arguments are not to be considered > stable, I opted to

[PR middle-end/71373] Handle more OMP_CLAUSE_* in nested function decomposition

2016-06-01 Thread Thomas Schwinge
cc/tree-nested.c handling. Everything else should be self-explanatory. OK for trunk and gcc-6-branch? commit e3a027408c82683d824003645dc3e4567a1435f7 Author: Thomas Schwinge Date: Wed Jun 1 17:01:35 2016 +0200 [PR middle-end/71373] Handle more OMP_CLAUSE_* in nested function decomposition