Re: [PR 54051 ARM] Fix alignment specifier alignment information for ARM.

2013-02-05 Thread Ramana Radhakrishnan
On 02/05/13 07:43, Ye Joey wrote: Ramana, This issue also impacts ldrexh/ldrexb, as assembler doesn't accept ldrexh r1, [r0, #0]. May it be backported to 4.7 by now? Thanks - Joey Ok by me unless RM's object. It's been on trunk long enough and hasn't caused any issues that I'm aware of. Th

Re: [PR 54051 ARM] Fix alignment specifier alignment information for ARM.

2013-02-04 Thread Ye Joey
Ramana, This issue also impacts ldrexh/ldrexb, as assembler doesn't accept ldrexh r1, [r0, #0]. May it be backported to 4.7 by now? Thanks - Joey On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 8:09 PM, Ramana Radhakrishnan wrote: > Hi , > > > While testing my neon intrinsics work with some testcases > that

[PR 54051 ARM] Fix alignment specifier alignment information for ARM.

2012-07-24 Thread Ramana Radhakrishnan
Hi , While testing my neon intrinsics work with some testcases that I was writing up, I ran into PR54051 . The one change which is probably a bit long standing is the fact that for register only addressing modes i.e. something like mem (reg:SI) we were printing out addresses with an imm