On Jul 11 2017, Maxim Ostapenko wrote:
> Ok, I see, it seems that we need to add convert in
> expand_asan_emit_allocas_unpoison too. This patch seems to work for me on
> aarch64 -mabi=ilp32, could you check it as well?
This fixes all regressions.
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, sch...@linux-m68k.
On 11/07/17 17:56, Andreas Schwab wrote:
On Jul 11 2017, Maxim Ostapenko wrote:
diff --git a/gcc/builtins.c b/gcc/builtins.c
index 608993a..6437979 100644
--- a/gcc/builtins.c
+++ b/gcc/builtins.c
@@ -4976,9 +4976,7 @@ expand_asan_emit_allocas_unpoison (tree exp)
EXPAN
On Jul 11 2017, Maxim Ostapenko wrote:
> diff --git a/gcc/builtins.c b/gcc/builtins.c
> index 608993a..6437979 100644
> --- a/gcc/builtins.c
> +++ b/gcc/builtins.c
> @@ -4976,9 +4976,7 @@ expand_asan_emit_allocas_unpoison (tree exp)
>EXPAND_NORMAL);
>rtx ret = init_one
On 11/07/17 16:51, Andreas Schwab wrote:
On Jul 10 2017, Maxim Ostapenko wrote:
diff --git a/gcc/asan.c b/gcc/asan.c
index 95004d7..89c2731 100644
--- a/gcc/asan.c
+++ b/gcc/asan.c
@@ -1567,9 +1567,10 @@ asan_emit_allocas_unpoison (rtx top, rtx bot, rtx_insn
*before)
else
start_sequ
On Jul 10 2017, Maxim Ostapenko wrote:
> diff --git a/gcc/asan.c b/gcc/asan.c
> index 95004d7..89c2731 100644
> --- a/gcc/asan.c
> +++ b/gcc/asan.c
> @@ -1567,9 +1567,10 @@ asan_emit_allocas_unpoison (rtx top, rtx bot, rtx_insn
> *before)
>else
> start_sequence ();
>rtx ret = init_o
Hi Andreas,
On 08/07/17 21:48, Andreas Schwab wrote:
This breaks gcc.dg/asan/pr80168.c on aarch64 -mabi=ilp32:
/opt/gcc/gcc-20170708/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/asan/pr80168.c:7:1: internal
compiler error: in emit_library_call_value_1, at calls.c:4555
0x701577 emit_library_call_value_1
../..
This breaks gcc.dg/asan/pr80168.c on aarch64 -mabi=ilp32:
/opt/gcc/gcc-20170708/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/asan/pr80168.c:7:1: internal
compiler error: in emit_library_call_value_1, at calls.c:4555
0x701577 emit_library_call_value_1
../../gcc/calls.c:4554
0x7068d7 emit_library_call_value(rtx_de
On Wed, 14 Jun 2017, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> Hi!
>
> So, I've tried to look at
> struct __attribute__((aligned (N))) S { char s[N]; };
>
> void bar (struct S *, struct S *);
>
> void
> foo (int x)
> {
> struct S a;
> {
> struct S b[x];
> bar (&a, &b[0]);
> }
> {
> struct S b[
Hi!
So, I've tried to look at
struct __attribute__((aligned (N))) S { char s[N]; };
void bar (struct S *, struct S *);
void
foo (int x)
{
struct S a;
{
struct S b[x];
bar (&a, &b[0]);
}
{
struct S b[x + 4];
bar (&a, &b[0]);
}
}
void
baz (int x)
{
struct S a;
struct
Hi Jakub,
thank you for your points. I've updated the patch.
-Maxim
gcc/ChangeLog:
2017-06-14 Maxim Ostapenko
* asan.c: Include gimple-fold.h.
(get_last_alloca_addr): New function.
(handle_builtin_stackrestore): Likewise.
(handle_builtin_alloca): Likewise.
(asan_emit_allocas_unpoison
On Tue, Jun 13, 2017 at 03:11:41PM +0300, Maxim Ostapenko wrote:
> @@ -531,11 +533,166 @@ get_mem_ref_of_assignment (const gassign *assignment,
>return true;
> }
>
> +/* Return address of last allocated dynamic alloca. */
> +
> +static tree
> +get_last_alloca_addr ()
> +{
> + if (last_allo
Hi,
I would like to ping the following patch:
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2017-05/msg01374.html
Rebased version is attached.
Thanks,
-Maxim
gcc/ChangeLog:
2017-06-13 Maxim Ostapenko
* asan.c: Include gimple-fold.h.
(get_last_alloca_addr): New function.
(handle_builtin_stackresto
12 matches
Mail list logo
