Re: [PING] Re: [PATCH] Fix PR46556 (poor address generation)

2011-11-02 Thread Richard Guenther
On Wed, 2 Nov 2011, William J. Schmidt wrote: > On Wed, 2011-11-02 at 12:55 +0100, Richard Guenther wrote: > > On Sun, 30 Oct 2011, William J. Schmidt wrote: > > > > > Ping. > > > > > > On Mon, 2011-10-24 at 08:38 -0500, William J. Schmidt wrote: > > > > OK, I've removed the pointer-arithmetic c

Re: [PING] Re: [PATCH] Fix PR46556 (poor address generation)

2011-11-02 Thread William J. Schmidt
On Wed, 2011-11-02 at 12:55 +0100, Richard Guenther wrote: > On Sun, 30 Oct 2011, William J. Schmidt wrote: > > > Ping. > > > > On Mon, 2011-10-24 at 08:38 -0500, William J. Schmidt wrote: > > > OK, I've removed the pointer-arithmetic case from expand, to be handled > > > later by straight-line s

Re: [PING] Re: [PATCH] Fix PR46556 (poor address generation)

2011-11-02 Thread Richard Guenther
On Sun, 30 Oct 2011, William J. Schmidt wrote: > Ping. > > On Mon, 2011-10-24 at 08:38 -0500, William J. Schmidt wrote: > > OK, I've removed the pointer-arithmetic case from expand, to be handled > > later by straight-line strength reduction. Here's the patch to deal > > with just the specific p

[PING] Re: [PATCH] Fix PR46556 (poor address generation)

2011-10-30 Thread William J. Schmidt
Ping. On Mon, 2011-10-24 at 08:38 -0500, William J. Schmidt wrote: > OK, I've removed the pointer-arithmetic case from expand, to be handled > later by straight-line strength reduction. Here's the patch to deal > with just the specific pattern of PR46556 (which will also eventually be > handled b