Re: [PING] Fix test case vect-nop-move.c

2014-01-25 Thread Jakub Jelinek
On Sat, Jan 25, 2014 at 09:27:21AM +0100, Bernd Edlinger wrote: > > No, check_vect () has to preceed all the vector statements in main, or > > often even better if main contains just check_vect () call and call to > > some other noinline routine that has the vector stuff in it. > > Otherwise, the t

RE: [PING] Fix test case vect-nop-move.c

2014-01-25 Thread Bernd Edlinger
Hi, On Thu, 23 Jan 2014 12:52:03, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 12:49:06PM +0100, Bernd Edlinger wrote: >> Hi, >> >> this might be almost obvious? > > No, check_vect () has to preceed all the vector statements in main, or > often even better if main contains just check_vect () c

Re: [PING] Fix test case vect-nop-move.c

2014-01-23 Thread Jakub Jelinek
On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 12:49:06PM +0100, Bernd Edlinger wrote: > Hi, > > this might be almost obvious? No, check_vect () has to preceed all the vector statements in main, or often even better if main contains just check_vect () call and call to some other noinline routine that has the vector stu

[PING] Fix test case vect-nop-move.c

2014-01-23 Thread Bernd Edlinger
Hi, this might be almost obvious? Thanks Bernd. > Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2014 12:13:53 +0100 > > Hello, > > there is another test case, that misses the necessary check_vect() runtime > check. > > Tested on i686-pc-linux-gnu. > OK for trunk? > > Regards > Bernd.