On 12/15/2014 05:24 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
Ok for trunk then.
All the 5 commits are submitted. Thank you very much for your review! :-)
--
Pierre-Marie de Rodat
On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 05:21:07PM +0100, Pierre-Marie de Rodat wrote:
> Ping for https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-12/msg00058.html.
Ok for trunk then.
> On 12/01/2014 05:40 PM, Pierre-Marie de Rodat wrote:
> >While I agree this might trigger compatibility issues with old
> >debuggers, I d
Ping for https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-12/msg00058.html.
On 12/01/2014 05:40 PM, Pierre-Marie de Rodat wrote:
While I agree this might trigger compatibility issues with old
debuggers, I don't know what to do assuming this change is not
acceptable: should we add a kludge in add_scalar_i
Hello,
On 10/08/2014 09:05 PM, Pierre-Marie de Rodat wrote:
The latest patches bootstrapped well and passed successfully the GCC
testsuite on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu.
Ping for https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-10/msg00694.html
Thanks in advance for you feedback!
--
Pierre-Marie de Rodat
On 10/03/2014 06:41 PM, Jason Merrill wrote:
Patches 1-4 are OK.
+ bool pell_conversions = true;
I don't understand "pell". Do you mean "strip"?
Absolutely: I though it was correct English. I replaced all occurences
of "pell" with "strip". Updates patches will follow...
Thank you very
On 09/17/2014 10:38 AM, Pierre-Marie de Rodat wrote:
Patches 1-4 are OK.
+ bool pell_conversions = true;
I don't understand "pell". Do you mean "strip"?
Jason
Ping for https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-09/msg00206.html
Adding a few maintainers in copy... Thanks in advance!
--
Pierre-Marie de Rodat
