On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 2:37 PM, John Marino wrote:
>
>> I don't understand the benefit of libgcc/enable-execute-stack-bsd.c.
>> The code seems the same as the existing
>> libgcc/enable-execute-stack-mprotect.c. All you are changing is
>> omitting need_enable_exec_stack. If you just drop the Fre
On 4/29/2014 19:23, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 11:37 AM, John Marino wrote:
>>
>> Does anyone have any issues with this set of patches to add support for
>> the DragonFly targets? It's a blocker for other patches of mine that
>> have a more general benefit, but this (relati
On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 11:37 AM, John Marino wrote:
>
> Does anyone have any issues with this set of patches to add support for
> the DragonFly targets? It's a blocker for other patches of mine that
> have a more general benefit, but this (relatively simple) one has to go
> in first.
It's incon
Hi folks,
Does anyone have any issues with this set of patches to add support for
the DragonFly targets? It's a blocker for other patches of mine that
have a more general benefit, but this (relatively simple) one has to go
in first.
Thanks,
John
On 4/20/2014 21:04, John Marino wrote:
> On 4/20/2
