On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 05:19:59PM +0800, Zhenqiang Chen wrote:
> > Or, fix up the insane arm costs for ASM_OPERANDS:
> > case ASM_OPERANDS:
> > /* Just a guess. Cost one insn per input. */
> > *cost = COSTS_N_INSNS (ASM_OPERANDS_INPUT_LENGTH (x));
> > return true;
> > I don
On 11 April 2014 00:10, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 01, 2014 at 11:41:12AM +0800, Zhenqiang Chen wrote:
>> Ping?
>>
>> Bootstrap and no make check regression on X86-64.
>>
>> Bootstrap on ARM. In ARM regression test, some new PASS and FAIL of
>> debug info check for gcc.dg/guality/pr36728-1
On 04/10/2014 09:10 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> 2014-04-10 Jakub Jelinek
>
> PR rtl-optimization/60663
> * cse.c (cse_insn): Set src_volatile on ASM_OPERANDS in
> PARALLEL.
>
> * gcc.target/arm/pr60663.c: New test.
Ok if it passes.
But you're right that ARM backend nee
On Tue, Apr 01, 2014 at 11:41:12AM +0800, Zhenqiang Chen wrote:
> Ping?
>
> Bootstrap and no make check regression on X86-64.
>
> Bootstrap on ARM. In ARM regression test, some new PASS and FAIL of
> debug info check for gcc.dg/guality/pr36728-1.c and
> gcc.dg/guality/pr36728-2.c since register a
Ping?
Bootstrap and no make check regression on X86-64.
Bootstrap on ARM. In ARM regression test, some new PASS and FAIL of
debug info check for gcc.dg/guality/pr36728-1.c and
gcc.dg/guality/pr36728-2.c since register allocation result is
different with the patch. There is no real new FAIL due to
