Thank you Segher, I will send an updated patch for stage 1.
regards,
Venkat.
On 22 January 2015 at 21:46, Segher Boessenkool
wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 07:29:28PM +0530, Venkataramanan Kumar wrote:
>> ping. Segher do you any comments from your side.
>
> I agree combine should not transfor
On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 07:29:28PM +0530, Venkataramanan Kumar wrote:
> ping. Segher do you any comments from your side.
I agree combine should not transform shifts into multiplication (except
in addresses, where it is canonical). I haven't looked at the actual
patch in detail though, it will hav
ping. Segher do you any comments from your side.
regards,
Venkat.
On 14 January 2015 at 16:57, Venkataramanan Kumar
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> When trying to debug GCC combiner pass with the test case in PR63949
> ref https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63949 I came across this
> code.
>
> T
