Re: [PING][PATCH 9/13] v2 Use new per-location warning APIs in LTO

2021-06-25 Thread Richard Biener via Gcc-patches
On Thu, Jun 24, 2021 at 5:27 PM Martin Sebor wrote: > > On 6/24/21 3:32 AM, Richard Biener wrote: > > On Mon, Jun 21, 2021 at 11:55 PM Martin Sebor via Gcc-patches > > wrote: > >> > >> Ping: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2021-June/571980.html > >> > >> Looking for a review of the LTO

Re: [PING][PATCH 9/13] v2 Use new per-location warning APIs in LTO

2021-06-24 Thread Martin Sebor via Gcc-patches
On 6/24/21 3:32 AM, Richard Biener wrote: On Mon, Jun 21, 2021 at 11:55 PM Martin Sebor via Gcc-patches wrote: Ping: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2021-June/571980.html Looking for a review of the LTO changes to switch TREE_NO_WARNING to the suppress_warning() API. Hmm, since th

Re: [PING][PATCH 9/13] v2 Use new per-location warning APIs in LTO

2021-06-24 Thread Richard Biener via Gcc-patches
On Mon, Jun 21, 2021 at 11:55 PM Martin Sebor via Gcc-patches wrote: > > Ping: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2021-June/571980.html > > Looking for a review of the LTO changes to switch TREE_NO_WARNING to > the suppress_warning() API. Hmm, since the warning suppressions are on location

[PING][PATCH 9/13] v2 Use new per-location warning APIs in LTO

2021-06-21 Thread Martin Sebor via Gcc-patches
Ping: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2021-June/571980.html Looking for a review of the LTO changes to switch TREE_NO_WARNING to the suppress_warning() API. On 6/4/21 3:43 PM, Martin Sebor wrote: The attached patch replaces the uses of TREE_NO_WARNING in the LTO front end with the new