"Andre Vieira (lists)" writes:
> Added the target check, also had to change some of the assembly checking
> due to changes upstream, the assembly is still valid, but we do extend
> where not necessary, I do believe that's a general issue though.
>
> The _BitInt(N > 64) codegen for non-powers of
Added the target check, also had to change some of the assembly checking
due to changes upstream, the assembly is still valid, but we do extend
where not necessary, I do believe that's a general issue though.
The _BitInt(N > 64) codegen for non-powers of 2 did get worse, we see
similar codegen
