Re: [PATCH v8 5/5] Add the 6th argument to .ACCESS_WITH_SIZE

2024-04-11 Thread Qing Zhao
Sid, Thanks a lot for your review. Richard, Could you please comment on this patch? Is the middle-end part Okay for stage 1? Thanks. Qing On Apr 10, 2024, at 17:48, Siddhesh Poyarekar wrote: On 2024-03-29 12:07, Qing Zhao wrote: to carry the TYPE of the flexible array. Such information is n

Re: [PATCH v8 5/5] Add the 6th argument to .ACCESS_WITH_SIZE

2024-04-10 Thread Siddhesh Poyarekar
On 2024-03-29 12:07, Qing Zhao wrote: to carry the TYPE of the flexible array. Such information is needed during tree-object-size.cc. We cannot use the result type or the type of the 1st argument of the routine .ACCESS_WITH_SIZE to decide the element type of the original array due to possible t

Re: [PATCH v8 5/5] Add the 6th argument to .ACCESS_WITH_SIZE

2024-04-10 Thread Joseph Myers
The C front-end changes in this patch are OK for GCC 15. -- Joseph S. Myers josmy...@redhat.com

[PATCH v8 5/5] Add the 6th argument to .ACCESS_WITH_SIZE

2024-03-29 Thread Qing Zhao
to carry the TYPE of the flexible array. Such information is needed during tree-object-size.cc. We cannot use the result type or the type of the 1st argument of the routine .ACCESS_WITH_SIZE to decide the element type of the original array due to possible type casting in the source code. gcc/c/C