On 4/25/23 09:20, Patrick O'Neill wrote:
On 4/24/23 22:52, Jeff Law wrote:
On 4/18/23 15:41, Patrick O'Neill wrote:
RISC-V has no support for subword atomic operations; code currently
generates libatomic library calls.
This patch changes the default behavior to inline subword atomic calls
On 4/24/23 22:52, Jeff Law wrote:
On 4/18/23 15:41, Patrick O'Neill wrote:
RISC-V has no support for subword atomic operations; code currently
generates libatomic library calls.
This patch changes the default behavior to inline subword atomic calls
(using the same logic as the existing librar
On 4/18/23 15:41, Patrick O'Neill wrote:
RISC-V has no support for subword atomic operations; code currently
generates libatomic library calls.
This patch changes the default behavior to inline subword atomic calls
(using the same logic as the existing library call).
Behavior can be specified
Ping
Also here's the corrected link for Jeff's comments:
https://inbox.sourceware.org/gcc-patches/f965671f-5997-0220-8831-a94e8c68d...@gmail.com/T/#m53e5d46a94868e68693e0d79455ca5343cf275a9
Patrick
On 4/18/23 14:41, Patrick O'Neill wrote:
RISC-V has no support for subword atomic operations;
RISC-V has no support for subword atomic operations; code currently
generates libatomic library calls.
This patch changes the default behavior to inline subword atomic calls
(using the same logic as the existing library call).
Behavior can be specified using the -minline-atomics and
-mno-inline-a
