ject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/5] Match: Add interface match_cond_with_binary_phi for
true/false arg
On Thu, Sep 12, 2024 at 3:41 AM Li, Pan2 wrote:
>
> Thanks Richard for comments.
>
> > why would arg_edge depend on whether t0 is INTEGER_CST or not?
> Because the edge->src of INTEGER_CST
ou are thinking of, more complex CFGs should
always mean more than a single controlling condition - I'm not sure we
want to go
the way to present those as cond1 | cond2.
Richard.
> Pan
>
> -Original Message-----
> From: Richard Biener
> Sent: Wednesday, September 11, 2024 9:39 PM
:39 PM
To: Li, Pan2
Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org; tamar.christ...@arm.com; juzhe.zh...@rivai.ai;
kito.ch...@gmail.com; jeffreya...@gmail.com; rdapp....@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/5] Match: Add interface match_cond_with_binary_phi for
true/false arg
On Wed, Sep 11, 2024 at 8:31 AM wrote:
&
On Wed, Sep 11, 2024 at 8:31 AM wrote:
>
> From: Pan Li
>
> When matching the cond with 2 args phi node, we need to figure out
> which arg of phi node comes from the true edge of cond block, as
> well as the false edge. This patch would like to add interface
> to perform the action and return th
From: Pan Li
When matching the cond with 2 args phi node, we need to figure out
which arg of phi node comes from the true edge of cond block, as
well as the false edge. This patch would like to add interface
to perform the action and return the true and false arg in TREE type.
There will be som
