On Wed, Aug 28, 2024 at 9:21 AM Richard Biener
wrote:
>
> On Wed, Aug 28, 2024 at 12:43 AM Edwin Lu wrote:
> >
> > On 8/22/2024 5:35 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
> > > On Thu, Aug 22, 2024 at 1:03 AM Edwin Lu wrote:
> > >>
> > >> Hi,
> > >>
> > >> Just wanted to ping this for more guidance.
> > >
>
On Wed, Aug 28, 2024 at 12:43 AM Edwin Lu wrote:
>
> On 8/22/2024 5:35 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 22, 2024 at 1:03 AM Edwin Lu wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> Just wanted to ping this for more guidance.
> >
> > It's difficult for me as long as I cannot investigate this with a testca
On 8/22/2024 5:35 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
On Thu, Aug 22, 2024 at 1:03 AM Edwin Lu wrote:
Hi,
Just wanted to ping this for more guidance.
It's difficult for me as long as I cannot investigate this with a testcase. Can
we go ahead with the other parts so the testcase can be added and the
On Thu, Aug 22, 2024 at 1:03 AM Edwin Lu wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Just wanted to ping this for more guidance.
It's difficult for me as long as I cannot investigate this with a testcase. Can
we go ahead with the other parts so the testcase can be added and the
issue reproduced?
Richard.
> Edwin
>
> O
Hi,
Just wanted to ping this for more guidance.
Edwin
On 7/24/2024 12:03 PM, Edwin Lu wrote:
On 7/24/2024 3:52 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
On Wed, Jul 24, 2024 at 1:31 AM Edwin Lu wrote:
On 7/23/2024 11:20 AM, Richard Sandiford wrote:
Edwin Lu writes:
On 7/23/2024 4:56 AM, Richard Biener
On 7/26/24 06:30, Richard Biener wrote:
On Thu, May 30, 2024 at 2:11 AM Patrick O'Neill wrote:
From: Greg McGary
gcc/ChangeLog:
* gcc/tree-vect-stmts.cc (gcc/tree-vect-stmts.cc): Prevent
divide-by-zero.
* testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/rvv/autovec/no-segment.c: Remove dg-ice.
-
On Thu, May 30, 2024 at 2:11 AM Patrick O'Neill wrote:
>
> From: Greg McGary
>
> gcc/ChangeLog:
> * gcc/tree-vect-stmts.cc (gcc/tree-vect-stmts.cc): Prevent
> divide-by-zero.
> * testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/rvv/autovec/no-segment.c: Remove dg-ice.
> ---
> No changes in v3. Depends
On 7/24/2024 3:03 AM, Robin Dapp wrote:
Thanks for the explanation! I have a few clarification questions about this.
If I understand correctly, B would represent the number of elements the
vector can have (for 128b vector operating on 32b elements, B == 4, but if
operating on 64b elements B ==
On 7/24/2024 3:03 AM, Robin Dapp wrote:
Thanks for the explanation! I have a few clarification questions about this.
If I understand correctly, B would represent the number of elements the
vector can have (for 128b vector operating on 32b elements, B == 4, but if
operating on 64b elements B ==
On 7/24/2024 3:52 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
On Wed, Jul 24, 2024 at 1:31 AM Edwin Lu wrote:
On 7/23/2024 11:20 AM, Richard Sandiford wrote:
Edwin Lu writes:
On 7/23/2024 4:56 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
On Tue, Jul 23, 2024 at 1:03 AM Edwin Lu wrote:
Hi Richard,
On 5/31/2024 1:48 AM, Ri
On Wed, Jul 24, 2024 at 1:31 AM Edwin Lu wrote:
>
>
> On 7/23/2024 11:20 AM, Richard Sandiford wrote:
> > Edwin Lu writes:
> >> On 7/23/2024 4:56 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
> >>> On Tue, Jul 23, 2024 at 1:03 AM Edwin Lu wrote:
> Hi Richard,
>
> On 5/31/2024 1:48 AM, Richard Biener
> Thanks for the explanation! I have a few clarification questions about this.
> If I understand correctly, B would represent the number of elements the
> vector can have (for 128b vector operating on 32b elements, B == 4, but if
> operating on 64b elements B == 2); however, I'm not too sure what A
On 7/23/2024 11:20 AM, Richard Sandiford wrote:
Edwin Lu writes:
On 7/23/2024 4:56 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
On Tue, Jul 23, 2024 at 1:03 AM Edwin Lu wrote:
Hi Richard,
On 5/31/2024 1:48 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
On Thu, May 30, 2024 at 2:11 AM Patrick O'Neill wrote:
From: Greg McGary
Edwin Lu writes:
> On 7/23/2024 4:56 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
>> On Tue, Jul 23, 2024 at 1:03 AM Edwin Lu wrote:
>>> Hi Richard,
>>>
>>> On 5/31/2024 1:48 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
On Thu, May 30, 2024 at 2:11 AM Patrick O'Neill
wrote:
> From: Greg McGary
Still a NACK. If
On 7/23/2024 4:56 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
On Tue, Jul 23, 2024 at 1:03 AM Edwin Lu wrote:
Hi Richard,
On 5/31/2024 1:48 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
On Thu, May 30, 2024 at 2:11 AM Patrick O'Neill wrote:
From: Greg McGary
Still a NACK. If remain ends up zero then
On Tue, Jul 23, 2024 at 1:03 AM Edwin Lu wrote:
>
> Hi Richard,
>
> On 5/31/2024 1:48 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
> > On Thu, May 30, 2024 at 2:11 AM Patrick O'Neill
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> From: Greg McGary
> >
> > Still a NACK. If remain ends up zero then
> >
> > /* Try to us
On Thu, May 30, 2024 at 2:11 AM Patrick O'Neill wrote:
>
> From: Greg McGary
Still a NACK. If remain ends up zero then
/* Try to use a single smaller load when we are about
to load excess elements compared to the unrolled
scalar
From: Greg McGary
gcc/ChangeLog:
* gcc/tree-vect-stmts.cc (gcc/tree-vect-stmts.cc): Prevent
divide-by-zero.
* testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/rvv/autovec/no-segment.c: Remove dg-ice.
---
No changes in v3. Depends on the risc-v backend option added in patch 1 to
trigger the ICE.
---
g
18 matches
Mail list logo