On Fri, Feb 24, 2023 at 11:05 AM Christoph Müllner
wrote:
>
> On Fri, Feb 24, 2023 at 10:54 AM Kito Cheng wrote:
> >
> > My impression is that md patterns will use first-match patterns? so
> > the zba will get higher priority than xtheadba if both patterns are
> > matched?
>
> Yes, I was just abo
On Fri, Feb 24, 2023 at 10:54 AM Kito Cheng wrote:
>
> My impression is that md patterns will use first-match patterns? so
> the zba will get higher priority than xtheadba if both patterns are
> matched?
Yes, I was just about to write this.
/opt/riscv-thead/bin/riscv64-unknown-linux-gnu-gcc -O2
My impression is that md patterns will use first-match patterns? so
the zba will get higher priority than xtheadba if both patterns are
matched?
On Fri, Feb 24, 2023 at 2:52 PM Andrew Pinski via Gcc-patches
wrote:
>
> On Thu, Feb 23, 2023 at 9:55 PM Christoph Muellner
> wrote:
> >
> > From: Chri
On Thu, Feb 23, 2023 at 9:55 PM Christoph Muellner
wrote:
>
> From: Christoph Müllner
>
> This patch adds support for the XTheadBa ISA extension.
> The new INSN pattern is defined in a new file to separate
> this vendor extension from the standard extensions.
How does this interact with doing -m
From: Christoph Müllner
This patch adds support for the XTheadBa ISA extension.
The new INSN pattern is defined in a new file to separate
this vendor extension from the standard extensions.
gcc/ChangeLog:
* config/riscv/riscv.md: Include thead.md
* config/riscv/thead.md: New fil