on 2024/5/29 14:52, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
> On May 27, 2024, "Kewen.Lin" wrote:
>
>> I wonder if it's possible to have a test case for this?
>
> gcc.dg/guality/pr54519-[34].c at -O[1g] are fixed by this patch on
Nice!
> ppc64le-linux-gnu. Are these the sort of test case you're interested
Ye
On Wed, May 29, 2024 at 03:52:15AM -0300, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
> On May 27, 2024, "Kewen.Lin" wrote:
>
> > I wonder if it's possible to have a test case for this?
>
> gcc.dg/guality/pr54519-[34].c at -O[1g] are fixed by this patch on
> ppc64le-linux-gnu. Are these the sort of test case you're
On May 27, 2024, "Kewen.Lin" wrote:
> I wonder if it's possible to have a test case for this?
gcc.dg/guality/pr54519-[34].c at -O[1g] are fixed by this patch on
ppc64le-linux-gnu. Are these the sort of test case you're interested
in, or are you looking for something that tests the offsets in de
On Sat, May 25, 2024 at 09:13:12AM -0300, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
> Some of the rs6000 call patterns, on some ABIs, issue multiple opcodes
> out of a single call insn, but the call (bl) or jump (b) is not always
> the last opcode in the sequence.
> This does not seem to be a problem for exception h
Hi,
on 2024/5/25 20:13, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
> On Apr 27, 2023, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
>
>> On Apr 14, 2023, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
>>> On Mar 23, 2023, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
This patch introduces infrastructure for targets to add an offset to
the label issued after the call_insn
On Apr 27, 2023, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
> On Apr 14, 2023, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
>> On Mar 23, 2023, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
>>> This patch introduces infrastructure for targets to add an offset to
>>> the label issued after the call_insn to set the call_return_pc
>>> attribute. This will be u
