so duplicating an inline for example in the case we split a function
and then
inline both parts or in the case we inline a IPA-CP forwarder and the
specific
clone. It's not obvious what we should do here since of course for a
recursive
function we can have a function inlined two times in a row
On 2024-08-08 09:04, Richard Biener wrote:
On Thu, Aug 8, 2024 at 4:55 AM Peter Damianov
wrote:
Currently, if a warning references a cloned function, the name of the
cloned
function will be emitted in the "In function 'xyz'" part of the
diagnostic,
which users aren't supposed to see. This pa
On Thu, Aug 8, 2024 at 4:55 AM Peter Damianov wrote:
>
> Currently, if a warning references a cloned function, the name of the cloned
> function will be emitted in the "In function 'xyz'" part of the diagnostic,
> which users aren't supposed to see. This patch follows the DECL_ORIGIN link
> to get
Currently, if a warning references a cloned function, the name of the cloned
function will be emitted in the "In function 'xyz'" part of the diagnostic,
which users aren't supposed to see. This patch follows the DECL_ORIGIN link
to get the name of the original function, so the internal compiler det