Re: [PATCH v3] Document that the 'access' and 'nonnull' attributes are independent

2022-04-05 Thread David Malcolm via Gcc-patches
On Fri, 2022-03-25 at 14:38 -0600, Martin Sebor wrote: > On 3/25/22 12:45, David Malcolm wrote: > > On Wed, 2022-03-23 at 17:52 +0100, Sebastian Huber wrote: > > > On 23/03/2022 17:31, Martin Sebor via Gcc-patches wrote: > > > > > > > > The concern is that the constraints implied by atttributes >

Re: [PATCH v3] Document that the 'access' and 'nonnull' attributes are independent

2022-03-25 Thread Martin Sebor via Gcc-patches
On 3/25/22 12:45, David Malcolm wrote: On Wed, 2022-03-23 at 17:52 +0100, Sebastian Huber wrote: On 23/03/2022 17:31, Martin Sebor via Gcc-patches wrote: The concern is that the constraints implied by atttributes access and nonnull are independent of each other. I would suggest to document th

[PATCH v3] Document that the 'access' and 'nonnull' attributes are independent

2022-03-25 Thread David Malcolm via Gcc-patches
On Wed, 2022-03-23 at 17:52 +0100, Sebastian Huber wrote: > On 23/03/2022 17:31, Martin Sebor via Gcc-patches wrote: > > > > The concern is that the constraints implied by atttributes access > > and > > nonnull are independent of each other. I would suggest to document > > that without talking ab