On 31.10.2017 19:45, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 31, 2017 at 07:28:23PM +0100, Kamil Rytarowski wrote:
>> I'm giving it a try. I took the asan part and skipped
>> "%{!shared:libasan_preinit%O%s} ". If I understand this correctly, it
>> attempts to use the ELF section with preinit property in
On Tue, Oct 31, 2017 at 07:28:23PM +0100, Kamil Rytarowski wrote:
> I'm giving it a try. I took the asan part and skipped
> "%{!shared:libasan_preinit%O%s} ". If I understand this correctly, it
> attempts to use the ELF section with preinit property in order to
> bootstrap asan quickly. The preinit
On 31.10.2017 15:04, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 31, 2017 at 02:53:26PM +0100, Kamil Rytarowski wrote:
http://netbsd.org/~kamil/gcc/test_summary.log.8-20171022.txt
>>>
>>> That seems that asan pretty much doesn't work at all in GCC for netbsd.
>>> A few FAILs might be acceptable, but so
On Tue, Oct 31, 2017 at 02:53:26PM +0100, Kamil Rytarowski wrote:
> >> http://netbsd.org/~kamil/gcc/test_summary.log.8-20171022.txt
> >
> > That seems that asan pretty much doesn't work at all in GCC for netbsd.
> > A few FAILs might be acceptable, but so many FAILs certainly aren't.
> > The tests
On 31.10.2017 14:22, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 30, 2017 at 09:01:25PM +0100, Kamil Rytarowski wrote:
>> On 30.10.2017 08:24, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
>>> On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 09:50:43PM +0200, Kamil Rytarowski wrote:
$ make check-asan
$ make check-asan-dynamic
$ make check-ub
On Mon, Oct 30, 2017 at 09:01:25PM +0100, Kamil Rytarowski wrote:
> On 30.10.2017 08:24, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 09:50:43PM +0200, Kamil Rytarowski wrote:
> >> $ make check-asan
> >> $ make check-asan-dynamic
> >> $ make check-ubsan
> >
> > That is testing of the upstream
On 30.10.2017 08:24, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 09:50:43PM +0200, Kamil Rytarowski wrote:
>> $ make check-asan
>> $ make check-asan-dynamic
>> $ make check-ubsan
>
> That is testing of the upstream code, not of GCC and the libsanitizer
> copy in GCC. What I'm more interested t
On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 09:50:43PM +0200, Kamil Rytarowski wrote:
> $ make check-asan
> $ make check-asan-dynamic
> $ make check-ubsan
That is testing of the upstream code, not of GCC and the libsanitizer
copy in GCC. What I'm more interested to hear is whether
you've bootstrapped/regtested the g
Tested on:
$ uname -rms
NetBSD 8.99.4 amd64
The NetBSD support has been developed directly in the compiler-rt upstream
source.
Testing against the LLVM+Clang+compiler-rt (2017-10-25 snapshot from HEAD):
$ make check-asan
Failing Tests (2):
AddressSanitizer-Unit ::
./Asan-x86_64-calls-Test/