On 8/3/23 05:21, Alex Coplan wrote:
Hi,
This patch implements clang's __has_feature and __has_extension in GCC.
This is a v3 which addresses feedback for the v2 patch posted here:
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2023-August/626058.html
Main changes since v2:
- As per Jason's feedba
On 17/08/2023 10:39, Alex Coplan via Gcc-patches wrote:
> I'd like to ping this for review from C and C++ maintainers:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2023-August/626178.html
Ping^2
>
> I probably should have dropped the RFC tag this time round as I think
> the patch is nearly ready,
I'd like to ping this for review from C and C++ maintainers:
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2023-August/626178.html
I probably should have dropped the RFC tag this time round as I think
the patch is nearly ready, I suppose we just need agreement on the
issues below: is there any GCC con
Hi Alex,
> On 3 Aug 2023, at 10:21, Alex Coplan wrote:
>
> This patch implements clang's __has_feature and __has_extension in GCC.
> This is a v3 which addresses feedback for the v2 patch posted here:
>
> https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2023-August/626058.html
>
> Main changes sinc
Hi,
This patch implements clang's __has_feature and __has_extension in GCC.
This is a v3 which addresses feedback for the v2 patch posted here:
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2023-August/626058.html
Main changes since v2:
- As per Jason's feedback, dropped the langhook in favour of
