On 11/15/23 00:13, Sam James wrote:
Florian Weimer writes:
* Sam James:
Florian Weimer writes:
Most -Wimplicit-int warnings were unconditionally disabled for system
headers. Only missing types for parameters in old-style function
definitions resulted in warnings. This is inconsistent with
Florian Weimer writes:
> * Sam James:
>
>> Florian Weimer writes:
>>
>>> Most -Wimplicit-int warnings were unconditionally disabled for system
>>> headers. Only missing types for parameters in old-style function
>>> definitions resulted in warnings. This is inconsistent with the
>>> treatmen
* Sam James:
> Florian Weimer writes:
>
>> Most -Wimplicit-int warnings were unconditionally disabled for system
>> headers. Only missing types for parameters in old-style function
>> definitions resulted in warnings. This is inconsistent with the
>> treatment of other permerrors, which are act
Florian Weimer writes:
> Most -Wimplicit-int warnings were unconditionally disabled for system
> headers. Only missing types for parameters in old-style function
> definitions resulted in warnings. This is inconsistent with the
> treatment of other permerrors, which are active in system heade
Most -Wimplicit-int warnings were unconditionally disabled for system
headers. Only missing types for parameters in old-style function
definitions resulted in warnings. This is inconsistent with the
treatment of other permerrors, which are active in system headers.
gcc/c/
* c-decl.cc (g
