Put them into main mdspan commit. No harm in having them.
On Tue, Jul 1, 2025 at 3:21 PM Luc Grosheintz
wrote:
> You're right, I remember checking this; but it appears I conned
> myself. I've reverted the change to , do you want to keep
> the tests?
>
> On 7/1/25 12:35, Tomasz Kaminski wrote:
>
You're right, I remember checking this; but it appears I conned
myself. I've reverted the change to , do you want to keep
the tests?
On 7/1/25 12:35, Tomasz Kaminski wrote:
Hi,
I do not think that the change is necessary, as for the functions default
on the first declaration
(as in the case for
Hi,
I do not think that the change is necessary, as for the functions default
on the first declaration
(as in the case for the constructors/assigments for mdpsan) have noexcept
specifier deduced
from it body. In other words, I think the test should pass, without adding
the complicated noexcept
con
If all members of mdspan are nothrow movable, then mdspan can also
be nothrow movable. The standard doesn't specify that mdspan must be
nothrow movable (when possible). Nothrow movable enables containers
to use move operations even if they have a strong exception guarantee.
This commit strenghtens
