On Tue, 21 Mar 2023, Arsen Arsenović wrote:
> Done!
>
> Gerald, please update the scripts when you get a chance (but back the
> old ones up just in case!)
Done. Minus the backup, since everything is in Git anyways, isn't it? :-)
The script should run in about 1 hour and 45 minutes.
> If makeinf
Arsen Arsenović via Gcc-patches writes:
> Thank you! I'll do a final rebase and push in the morning.
Done!
Gerald, please update the scripts when you get a chance (but back the
old ones up just in case!)
If makeinfo is updated as I've asked in one of the other emails, will
the script eventua
Sandra Loosemore writes:
> On 3/18/23 14:14, Arsen Arsenović via Gcc-patches wrote:
>> Evening,
>> Ping on this patch series.
>> I believe we're close to being able to apply it, with contents of the
>> documentation changes being approved, and only a small build system
>> change and a revised pa
Joseph Myers writes:
> On Mon, 20 Mar 2023, Sandra Loosemore wrote:
>
>> Joseph, could you maybe review the last piece? A direct pointer to it in
>> Arsen's git is
>>
>> https://git.sr.ht/~arsen/gcc/commit/bc734311cbca1085a1728f79b7eebef8cc7aeac3
>
> That's OK, assuming I understand correctly
On Mon, 20 Mar 2023, Sandra Loosemore wrote:
> Joseph, could you maybe review the last piece? A direct pointer to it in
> Arsen's git is
>
> https://git.sr.ht/~arsen/gcc/commit/bc734311cbca1085a1728f79b7eebef8cc7aeac3
That's OK, assuming I understand correctly that makeinfo will still
succeed
On 3/18/23 14:14, Arsen Arsenović via Gcc-patches wrote:
Evening,
Ping on this patch series.
I believe we're close to being able to apply it, with contents of the
documentation changes being approved, and only a small build system
change and a revised patch series "shape" left to review.
Yup.
Evening,
Ping on this patch series.
I believe we're close to being able to apply it, with contents of the
documentation changes being approved, and only a small build system
change and a revised patch series "shape" left to review.
The former change of these two is in:
https://inbox.sourceware.o
Hi Gerald,
Gerald Pfeifer writes:
> On Fri, 10 Mar 2023, Arsen Arsenović wrote:
>> Thanks, Thomas. I'd be happy to undergo this process later today. If I
>> understood right, I should fill out
>> https://sourceware.org/cgi-bin/pdw/ps_form.cgi and name you, right?
>
> Yes.
Thanks, done. Exci
Afternoon,
Sandra Loosemore writes:
> On 2/23/23 03:27, Arsen Arsenović via Gcc-patches wrote:
>> The @gol macro appears to have existed as a workaround for a bug in old
>> versions of makeinfo and/or texinfo.tex, where they would, in some types
>> of output, fail to emit line breaks in @gccoptl
On Fri, 10 Mar 2023, Arsen Arsenović wrote:
> Thanks, Thomas. I'd be happy to undergo this process later today. If I
> understood right, I should fill out
> https://sourceware.org/cgi-bin/pdw/ps_form.cgi and name you, right?
Yes.
(Thomas, you, and me actually could have met a FOSDEM. Next year
Hi Gerald, Thomas,
Thomas Schwinge writes:
> Hi!
>
> On 2023-03-10T01:17:04+0100, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
>> On Thu, 9 Mar 2023, Sandra Loosemore wrote:
>>> This is OK, but I'd like to see this patch split into two separate
>>> commits as well -- one for the texinfo.tex import, and one for the @g
Morning,
Sandra Loosemore writes:
> On 2/23/23 03:27, Arsen Arsenović via Gcc-patches wrote:
>> The @gol macro appears to have existed as a workaround for a bug in old
>> versions of makeinfo and/or texinfo.tex, where they would, in some types
>> of output, fail to emit line breaks in @gccoptlis
Hi!
On 2023-03-10T01:17:04+0100, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
> On Thu, 9 Mar 2023, Sandra Loosemore wrote:
>> This is OK, but I'd like to see this patch split into two separate
>> commits as well -- one for the texinfo.tex import, and one for the @gol
>> changes.
>
> I believe Arsen does not have git w
On Thu, 9 Mar 2023, Sandra Loosemore wrote:
> This is OK, but I'd like to see this patch split into two separate
> commits as well -- one for the texinfo.tex import, and one for the @gol
> changes.
I believe Arsen does not have git write access.
Arsen, if that is indeed the case, I offer to pus
On 2/23/23 03:27, Arsen Arsenović via Gcc-patches wrote:
The @gol macro appears to have existed as a workaround for a bug in old
versions of makeinfo and/or texinfo.tex, where they would, in some types
of output, fail to emit line breaks in @gccoptlists. After updating
texinfo.tex, I noticed tha
15 matches
Mail list logo
