> > See the thread about the instrumentation pass which currently
> > is implemented on GIMPLE.
>
> What are the issues for instrumenting as an RTL pass?
It just needs to be completely rewritten and might be more complicated.
And it might be more difficult to avoid redundant instrumentation
with
On Thu, Nov 22, 2018 at 5:24 AM Richard Biener
wrote:
>
> On Wed, Nov 21, 2018 at 4:38 PM H.J. Lu wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Nov 21, 2018 at 6:48 AM Richard Biener
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > On Tue, Nov 20, 2018 at 7:36 PM Andi Kleen wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, Nov 20, 2018 at 11:53:15AM +0100, Rich
On Wed, Nov 21, 2018 at 4:38 PM H.J. Lu wrote:
>
> On Wed, Nov 21, 2018 at 6:48 AM Richard Biener
> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Nov 20, 2018 at 7:36 PM Andi Kleen wrote:
> > >
> > > On Tue, Nov 20, 2018 at 11:53:15AM +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
> > > > On Fri, Nov 16, 2018 at 8:07 AM Uros Bizjak wr
On Wed, Nov 21, 2018 at 6:48 AM Richard Biener
wrote:
>
> On Tue, Nov 20, 2018 at 7:36 PM Andi Kleen wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Nov 20, 2018 at 11:53:15AM +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
> > > On Fri, Nov 16, 2018 at 8:07 AM Uros Bizjak wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Fri, Nov 16, 2018 at 4:57 AM Andi Kleen
On Tue, Nov 20, 2018 at 7:36 PM Andi Kleen wrote:
>
> On Tue, Nov 20, 2018 at 11:53:15AM +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 16, 2018 at 8:07 AM Uros Bizjak wrote:
> > >
> > > On Fri, Nov 16, 2018 at 4:57 AM Andi Kleen wrote:
> > > >
> > > > From: Andi Kleen
> > > >
> > > > The earlier
On Tue, Nov 20, 2018 at 11:53:15AM +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 16, 2018 at 8:07 AM Uros Bizjak wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Nov 16, 2018 at 4:57 AM Andi Kleen wrote:
> > >
> > > From: Andi Kleen
> > >
> > > The earlier PTWRITE builtin definition was unnecessarily restrictive,
> > > only
On Fri, Nov 16, 2018 at 8:07 AM Uros Bizjak wrote:
>
> On Fri, Nov 16, 2018 at 4:57 AM Andi Kleen wrote:
> >
> > From: Andi Kleen
> >
> > The earlier PTWRITE builtin definition was unnecessarily restrictive,
> > only allowing register input to PTWRITE. The instruction actually
> > supports memor
On Fri, Nov 16, 2018 at 4:57 AM Andi Kleen wrote:
>
> From: Andi Kleen
>
> The earlier PTWRITE builtin definition was unnecessarily restrictive,
> only allowing register input to PTWRITE. The instruction actually
> supports memory operands too, so allow that too.
>
> gcc/:
>
> 2018-11-15 Andi Kl
From: Andi Kleen
The earlier PTWRITE builtin definition was unnecessarily restrictive,
only allowing register input to PTWRITE. The instruction actually
supports memory operands too, so allow that too.
gcc/:
2018-11-15 Andi Kleen
* config/i386/i386.md: Allow memory operands to ptwri
