On Tue, 29 Mar 2022, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
> | --- gcc/c-family/c.opt
> | +++ gcc/c-family/c.opt
> | [...]
> | +# Defining these options here in addition to common.opt is necessary
> | +# in order for the default -Wall setting of -Wuse-after-free=2 to take
> | +# effect.
> | +
> | +Wuse-after-fre
On 3/29/22 03:24, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
Hi!
On 2022-01-15T17:00:11-0700, Martin Sebor via Gcc-patches
wrote:
On 1/11/22 15:40, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 11/30/21 17:32, Martin Sebor via Gcc-patches wrote:
[default setting of the option]
Let's put =2 in -Wall for now.
I've adjusted [...
Hi!
On 2022-01-15T17:00:11-0700, Martin Sebor via Gcc-patches
wrote:
> On 1/11/22 15:40, Jason Merrill wrote:
>> On 11/30/21 17:32, Martin Sebor via Gcc-patches wrote:
>>> [default setting of the option]
>> Let's put =2 in -Wall for now.
> I've adjusted [...] and pushed r12-6605 [...]
That's
Hi!
On 2022-01-15T17:00:11-0700, Martin Sebor via Gcc-patches
wrote:
> On 1/11/22 15:40, Jason Merrill wrote:
>> On 11/30/21 17:32, Martin Sebor via Gcc-patches wrote:
>>> [default setting of the option]
>> Let's put =2 in -Wall for now.
> I've adjusted [...] and pushed r12-6605 [...]
Pushed
On 1/11/2022 3:40 PM, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 11/30/21 17:32, Martin Sebor via Gcc-patches wrote:
Attached is a revised patch with the following changes based
on your comments:
1) Set and use statement uids to determine which statement
precedes which in the same basic block.
2) Avoid tes
On 1/11/22 15:40, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 11/30/21 17:32, Martin Sebor via Gcc-patches wrote:
Attached is a revised patch with the following changes based
on your comments:
1) Set and use statement uids to determine which statement
precedes which in the same basic block.
2) Avoid testing fl
On 11/30/21 17:32, Martin Sebor via Gcc-patches wrote:
Attached is a revised patch with the following changes based
on your comments:
1) Set and use statement uids to determine which statement
precedes which in the same basic block.
2) Avoid testing flag_isolate_erroneous_paths_dereference.
Last ping before stage 3 ends:
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2021-November/585816.html
On 1/4/22 11:01, Martin Sebor wrote:
Ping. (CC'ing Jason as requested.)
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2021-November/585816.html
On 12/13/21 9:48 AM, Martin Sebor wrote:
Ping.
Jeff,
Ping. (CC'ing Jason as requested.)
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2021-November/585816.html
On 12/13/21 9:48 AM, Martin Sebor wrote:
Ping.
Jeff, I addressed your comments in the updated patch. If there
are no other changes is the last revision okay to commit?
https://gcc.gnu.org/
Ping.
Jeff, I addressed your comments in the updated patch. If there
are no other changes is the last revision okay to commit?
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2021-November/585816.html
On 12/6/21 5:50 PM, Martin Sebor wrote:
Ping:
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2021-Novem
Ping:
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2021-November/585816.html
On 11/30/21 3:32 PM, Martin Sebor wrote:
Attached is a revised patch with the following changes based
on your comments:
1) Set and use statement uids to determine which statement
precedes which in the same basic block
Attached is a revised patch with the following changes based
on your comments:
1) Set and use statement uids to determine which statement
precedes which in the same basic block.
2) Avoid testing flag_isolate_erroneous_paths_dereference.
3) Use post-dominance to decide whether to use the "maybe
12 matches
Mail list logo
